Click here to see the conditions leading to fascism.
You will see sources 1-3 and 5-9. To see source 4, scroll down the page to click on the video.
Tuesday, March 29, 2016
Monday, March 21, 2016
Conditions Leading to Fascism- Discontent
Discontent Source
1
Italy fought on the side of the Allies in World War I. In the
secret Treaty of London, Britain promised Italy that it would gain the
territory in light green on the map below. Italy joined the war and 500,000
Italians lost their lives.
Thursday, March 3, 2016
Trench Stations
Poetry Station!
Click here to listen to the poem.
Be sure to read and follow along as you listen.
Please use headphones.
Click here to see World War I propaganda examples and to finish your classwork from Thursday March 3.
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
All Quiet on the Western Front- Chapter 4
Click on this link to see chapter 4 of All Quiet on the Western Front.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1grear-b_K6bml1MnFpa0dGSmM/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1grear-b_K6bml1MnFpa0dGSmM/view?usp=sharing
Thursday, December 3, 2015
Was Government Regulation an Effective Way to Stop the Abuses of the Factory System?
Evidence #1: This is a section from a report of a factory inspector that was taken in 1836- three years after the Factory Act was passed.
Extract from a Factory Inspectors report of Taylor, Ibbotson, and Company.- British Parliamentary Papers (1836)
Talk to an elbow partner: Does this evidence suggest that the Factory Act was an effective way to stop abuses in the factory system? Why or why not?
Evidence #2: This photo was taken about 50 years after the passage of the Factory Act.
Talk to an elbow partner: Does this evidence suggest that the Factory Act was an effective way to stop abuses in the factory system? Why or why not?
Evidence #3: This table shows companies that were inspected 30 years after the passage of the Factory Act and found to be breaking the law. You can see what part of the law was broken, and how much the company has to pay in fines.
British money of the 1830s is different from American money of today.
Extract from a Factory Inspectors report of Taylor, Ibbotson, and Company.- British Parliamentary Papers (1836)
My Lord, in the case of Taylor, Ibbotson, and Company I took the evidence from the mouths of the boys themselves. They stated to me that they commenced [started]working on Friday morning, the 27th of May, at six AM, and that, with the exception of meal hours and one hour at midnight extra, they did not cease working till four o’clock on Saturday evening, having been two days and a night thus engaged. Believing the case scarcely possible, I asked every boy the same question, and from each received the same answers. I then went into the house to look at the time book, and, in the presence of one of the masters, referred to the cruelty of the case, and stated that I should certainly punish it with all the severity in my power.
Talk to an elbow partner: Does this evidence suggest that the Factory Act was an effective way to stop abuses in the factory system? Why or why not?
Evidence #2: This photo was taken about 50 years after the passage of the Factory Act.
Talk to an elbow partner: Does this evidence suggest that the Factory Act was an effective way to stop abuses in the factory system? Why or why not?British money of the 1830s is different from American money of today.
- One British Pound (£) is like one US Dollar ($1).
- One British shilling (s.) is like one US nickel (5 ¢).
- One British pence (p.) is like one US penny. (1¢)
|
Date
|
Sept 20,1863
|
|
Names and Addresses of Persons summoned.
|
Mary Jones, near Bridgend, Glamorganshire
|
|
Names of the Judges who heard the Case, and place
of Hearing.
|
Richard Franklyn and Charles Knight. Town Hall,
Bridgend.
|
|
Nature of the Offence.
|
Employing three young
persons after 6p.m.
|
|
Amount of Penalty.
|
£1
|
|
Amount of Costs to be repaid to the court.
|
£1
|
|
Date
|
Sept 24, 1863
|
|
Names and Addresses of Persons summoned.
|
John Jones, Forest Factory, near Newbridge,
|
|
Names of the Judges who heard the Case, and place
of Hearing.
|
William Perkins, and the Rev.Evan Morgan; Newbridge,
Glamorganshire.
|
|
Nature of the Offence.
|
Employing three young persons and one female (adult) after
6p.m.
|
|
Amount of Penalty.
|
£1
|
|
Amount of Costs to be repaid to the court.
|
£1 ,10s. , 3p.
|
|
Remarks
|
Three cases withdrawn on payment of costs.
|
|
Date
|
Sept. 26, 1863
|
|
Names and Addresses of Persons summoned.
|
William Llewellyn, Lamb and Flag Factory, Glynneath
|
|
Names of the Judges who heard the Case, and place
of Hearing.
|
Ilowel Gwyn and Griffith Llewellyn, Town Hall, Neath
|
|
Nature of the Offence.
|
Employing three young persons and two children after 6p.m.
|
|
Amount of Penalty.
|
£ 2
|
|
Amount of Costs to be repaid to the court.
|
£3 , 9s.
|
|
Remarks
|
Four cases withdrawn on payment of costs.
|
|
Date
|
July 21, 1863
|
|
Names and Addresses of Persons summoned.
|
William Kirk, Burnley.
|
|
Names of the Magistrates who heard the Case, and place
of Hearing.
|
Thomas Hordern Whittaker and John Neels Esqrs.; Burnley
|
|
Nature of the Offence.
|
Employing two young persons without doctor certificates
|
|
Amount of Penalty.
|
£3
|
|
Amount of Costs to be repaid to the court.
|
£1
|
|
Remarks
|
One summons withdrawn on payment of costs, in consideration
of the state of trade
|
Talk to an elbow partner: Does this evidence suggest that the Factory Act was an effective way to stop abuses in the factory system? Why or why not?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

